Skip to content
  • Texas | Arizona | Virginia | Idaho | Illinois
  • (888) 705-0930
  • info@therawragency.com
Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin-in
rawr logo short
  • Home
  • About
  • Solutions
  • Industries
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact
colorized icons 04
B2B Marketing
colorized icons 05
B2C Marketing
colorized icons
Online Visibility Management
colorized icons 07
Healthcare
colorized icons 08
Manufacturing
colorized icons 01
Brand Strategy
  • Graphic Design
  • Corporate Brand Identity
  • Sales Enablement
  • Editorial Calendar Management
colorized icons 02
Website Design
  • WordPress Website Development
  • Conversion Rate Optimization
  • eCommerce Development
  • Content Strategy & Copywriting
colorized icons 03
Digital Marketing
  • Digital Marketing Strategy
  • Search Engine Optimization (SEO)
  • Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Management
  • Content Marketing & Digital PR
  • Account Based Marketing (B2B)
  • Marketing Automation
Let's Talk

Google desktop favicon search results study

image2 800x425 2
  • January 17, 2020
  • General
  • Agency
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

In 2019, Google introduced a new format in mobile search results which included a small “favicon” icon from the website, to the left of the snippet. This week, Google announced that a similar format was being launched in desktop results.

Yard carried out a user study on mobile results in September that concluded that some users think that favicon results are ads. When the desktop results launched we carried out a similar study to identify the effect of the changes.

Methodology

We asked a set of 250 users to look at 12 images of desktop search results and answer the question “Does this image contain any adverts?” with a “yes” or “no.” These results were compared to results of the old format, without favicons, for the same search queries.

Search query: Car insurance

There were 4 paid ads at the top of the search results. In the old format, 73% of users identified that there was advertising on the page. In the new “favicon” format, this changes slightly to 71%.

Search query: Online programming courses

“Online programming courses” was the query used as an example by Google so it seemed right to test it thoroughly. We looked at three versions – with a single ad at the top, with no ads and with a single ad at the bottom.

Single ad at the top

Users identified that there was advertising on the page 67% of the time with the new favicon format, an increase from 63% on the old format.

Single ad at the bottom

There was no change for the result where the ad was at the bottom of the page. This suggests that the new “Ad” marker might be clearer to users, given it’s more visible at the top of the page than at the bottom.

No ads

The most significant change found was when there were no ads at all. The number of users who identified that there were no ads dropped from 65% to 57% with the new format.

Search query: home insurance

The pattern of users seeing ads that weren’t there was found consistently throughout the study. The percentage of users correctly identifying that there were no ads here dropped from 62% to 55% for “home insurance.”

Search query: Flights to New York

The biggest drop we noted was for “flights to new york” where only 58% correctly identified that there were no ads on the old format, this plummeted to 42% with the new format.

Conclusion

The effect that we noted on mobile, where recognition of advertising remains the same or even increases a little with the introduction of favicons is also seen on desktop. It is possible that the number of people recognizing advertising from the correct signals (e.g. “ad” markers) drops as it is clear that some users think the favicons indicate ads.

It seems likely also that some users may have missed the black ad markers due to their similar appearance to favicons but this is difficult to confirm using this methodology.

The number of people who identify ads on Google search results was alarmingly low with the old format. The new format doesn’t seem to have changed that percentage significantly but has made identification of the actual ads less accurate. In other words, people think more things are ads when they are not and may identify real ads less often.

With this change on mobile and desktop, Google has reached the limits of hiding “ad” markers and has chosen instead to change the paradigm, making natural results appear more like regular results.

The logical conclusion of this approach is that the idea that search results are paid for is normalized, gradually increasing the amount of advertising space which is considered acceptable to users.

That assumes, of course, that we shouldn’t accept Hanlon’s razor to never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. In this case, Google is smart enough to know exactly what it is doing and has tested these changes thoroughly before rolling them out.

The post Google desktop favicon search results study appeared first on Search Engine Land.


Source: IAB

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Blog Posts

The Future of Healthcare: Unveiling the Potential of Personalized Care

September 18, 2023

Roaring Customer Experiences in Manufacturing: The Rawr Agency to the Rescue!

September 6, 2023

Empowering Healthcare: Patient Engagement Tools at Play

August 29, 2023

Driving Towards a Sustainable Future: Embracing Decentralized Manufacturing

August 23, 2023

Embracing Patient-Centered Care in 2023: A Game-Changer for Healthcare Executives

August 15, 2023
View More
rawr logo short
Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin-in
Get In Touch
  • Texas | Arizona | Virginia | Idaho | Illinois
  • (888) 705-0930
  • info@therawragency.com
Send An Email

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Copyright 2023 | The RAWR Agency, LLC. |

Sitemap | Privacy Policy